Evaluation Of Social Rehabilitation Program For Children In Conflict With The Law At Balai Rehabilitasi Sosial Anak Memerlukan Perlindungan Khusus (BRSAMPK) Rumbai Pekanbaru

Authors

  • Rieza Satifa Program Pascasarjana, Departemen Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, Universitas Indonesia
  • Isbandi Rukminto Adi Program Pascasarjana, Departemen Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, Universitas Indonesia

Keywords:

children in conflict with the law, sosial evaluation program, social rehabilitation

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the social rehabilitation program for children in conflict with the law in BRSAMPK Rumbai. The beneficiaries of this program are children referred by LPKA (juvenile prison) to undergo the children to social rehabilitation process and returned to their families or communities. By using a qualitative approach and type evaluation, informant from this research is children with cases of sex abuse who have returned to the family and run social life in the community. The main informant is ABH who is domiciled in Pekanbaru City and Pelalawan Regency. In total 17 informants consisted of ABH, family, program implementing staff (social workers, psychologists and nurse). The results of this study indicate that based on logical model evaluation indicators, this program can be said to be successful in the implementation process, although some important notes must be of mutual concern. In the discussion chapter, there are models of handling ABH in several countries. The recommendations of this study suggest that the government needs to think of a more effective, efficient and appropriate follow-up actions to reduce the number of ABH cases in Riau Province.

References

Adi, Isbandi Rukminto, 2013. Intervensi Komunitas dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Anleu, Sharyn L. Roach. 2006. Deviance, Confirmity & Control: 4th Edition. Australia: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Ashman, Karen K. Kirsta. 2010. Social Work & Social Welfare Critical Thinking Persepectives 3rd Edition. Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd

Creswell, W Jhon. 2014. Research Design Qualitive, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaces 4th Edition. London: Sage Publication

Iswari, Maria Sri. 2016. Kajian Mediasi Anak yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Kesejahteraan Sosial. (Disertasi). Depok: FISIP

Lincoln, Y.S., and E. A. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Kusek, Jody Zall andRist, Ray C. 2004. A Handbook for Development Practitioners. Ten Steps to A Result-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System. Washington D.C : The World Bank

Mark, Melvin M, Hendry, Gary T and Julnes, George. 2000. Evaluation: an integrated framework for understanding, guiding and improving public and nonprofit policies and programs. California: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Midgley, James , 1995. Social Development: The Developmental Perspective in Social Welfare. London: SAGE Publication

Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2016). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches 7th Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed). California: Sage Publications, Inc

Pietrzak, Jeane, dkk. 1990. Practical Program Evaluation: examples from child abouse preventation. California Sage Publications.

Santrock, J.W. 2012. Essentials of life-span Development. New York: McGraw-Hill

Tropman, Jhon E., Rothman J and Erlich, Jhon L. (1995) Tactics and Techniques of community intervention: macro practice (Third Edition). Illnois: F.E Peacock Publisher. Inc

Zastrow, Charles. 2004. Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare Empoweing people (8th Edition). USA: Thomson Learning.

Zastrow, Charles. 2010. Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare Empoweing people (10th Edition). USA: Thomson Learning.

Website: http://nasional.tempo.co.read/89362 7/riau-tertinggi-keduakasus- kekerasan-terhadapanak

Published

2019-07-01

Issue

Section

Artikel